Jon Lester pitched well, but it wasn't enough.
If the Red Sox expect to be in the running for a
playoff spot in the second half of the season, there is one area they certainly
need to improve in: their record in low-scoring games.
After last night’s heartbreaking 3-2 setback at Oakland,
the Sox are just 4-29 in games in which they have scored three or fewer runs.
This translates out to a .121 winning percentage, one of the worst such marks
in the majors. It also points to a key deficiency on the year's team—top-notch
starting pitching.
Unlike past years—when the Red Sox always had at least
one clear ace who could match up against top opposing starters—the
inconsistency on this year's Boston staff has made for many frustrating nights.
Even when a pitcher has a strong start, like Jon Lester Tuesday, he seldom
makes it through seven innings due to high pitch counts and a quick hook from
Bobby Valentine.
Adding to the angst is that the Sox still have one of
baseball's best offensive clubs overall, ranking third in the AL in average
(.268), slugging (.444) and OPS (.772) through Monday. They have won their
share of 9-4 and 15-5 games, but have struggled along at around .500 all year
because of their low-scoring losses.
June offers a perfect microcosm of the problem. While the Red Sox had a decent 15-12 record overall for the month, they were 1-9 when scoring three or less runs—including 1-0 and 3-2 losses to the lowly Mariners last week.
Strasburg and the Nationals had the Sox' number.
During a 1-5 homestand against Baltimore and
Washington earlier in June, Boston lost games of 2-1, 4-2 and 4-3. They were
swept by the Nationals—who got excellent starting performances from their
terrific trio of Stephen Strasburg, Gio Gonzalez and Jordan Zimmerman. The Red
Sox got decent pitching as well during that series, but it wasn't quite good
enough.
Boston fans have been spoiled for most
of the past 25 years. Even when the Red Sox didn't make the playoffs, they had
a dominating pitcher who could win the 2-1 and 4-2 games. First it was Roger
Clemens, then Pedro Martinez, and then Curt Schilling. To a slightly lesser
degree, Josh Beckett and Jon Lester have fit this bill the last couple of
seasons, but this has been an ace-less year.
Beckett (4-7), Lester (5-5) and the demoted Daniel Bard
(5-6) have all been disappointments; and while Clay Buchholz (8-2) and Felix
Doubront (8-4) both have winning records, their ERAs of 5.53 and 4.42 make it
clear they have been the beneficiary of very strong run support.
Although closer Alfredo Aceves blew Tuesday's game, for
the most part Boston's surprisingly efficient relief corps have kept them from
falling even further into mediocrity. There is not much these guys can do,
however, if they usually get the ball with the Sox already behind.
Pedro is gone, but the Sox need an ace.
After the end of this woeful West Coast string, Boston
has four big games with the AL East-leading Yankees heading into the all-star
break. Somebody on the starting staff needs to step up against New York and in
the weeks that follow if the Red Sox want to be playing come October.
I say ship Lester and Jacoby off to Seattle for Felix.
ReplyDeleteNot a bad thought, anonymous. The Sox are real high on this kid Bradley in AA, who has near-Ellsbury speed, power, and a better arm. They certainly are not looking forward to finding the money for Ellsbury's next contract. But would Seattle be willing to eat some of Beckett's contract?
ReplyDelete